Bipartisan advocates for smart, sustainable environmental policies in Connecticut



Tuesday, June 7, 2011

HADDAM LAND SWAP: TAKE IT OUT OF THE CONVEYANCE ACT

Since our message to legislators on June 6, more and more citizen and environmental groups have either publicly opposed, or are calling for a more thorough review of, the proposed Haddam land swap, now bringing the list of organizations to a total of 35.  They are listed below. 

If you would like to help keep up the pressure please call these two legislators and ask them to oppose this transfer until it can be fully examined:

  • Senator Martin Looney, Majority Leader: 860-240-0375
  • Representative Brendan Sharkey, Majority Leader: 860-240-8500

------------

HADDAM LAND SWAP:  TAKE IT OUT OF THE CONVEYANCE ACT

The Connecticut League of Conservation Voters opposes Section 10 of Bill 1196 as a violation of the commitment the state made to the public and the seller to protect this open space in perpetuity.

SECTION 10 OF THE BILL HANDS OVER TO A PRIVATE DEVELOPER LAND ACQUIRED BY THE STATE FOR $1.3 MILLION. 

The land to be taken from the public is 17 acres overlooking Eagle Landing State Park and the Connecticut River in Haddam.  Price: $1.3 million, 2003.

The land to be given to the public instead is 87 acres adjacent to Cockaponset state park, logged, and burdened by an easement to a water bottling company.  Price: $450,000, 2009.

The land to be taken from the public was purchased for conservation by the Recreation and Natural Heritage Trust Fund.  It is part of a Wildlife Management Area.

The only condition the developer might have to meet is to allow the public on to a portion of the land, such as a parking lot or a path across the lot. The developer could flip the land.  No development is required.   

THE SWAP HAS NOT BEEN FULLY VETTED BY THE DEP OR THE ADVISORY BOARD OF THE RECREATION AND NATURAL HERITAGE TRUST OR ANYONE IN GOVERNMENT

Is it in the interest of the state to promote development on the river in Haddam?  Maybe.

Is it in the interest of the state to override its policies and principles by an unexamined handover of public property into private hands.  NO. 

THE PROCESS IS HORRIBLE AND LOOKS HORRIBLE. 

Others who either oppose or are calling for a more thorough review are::

1. Audubon Connecticut

2. Beacon Falls Conservation Commission

3. Beacon Falls Land Use Committee

4. Citizens Campaign for the Environment

5. Colchester Land Trust

6. Connecticut Audubon Society

7. Connecticut Association of Inland Wetland and Conservation Commissions

8. Connecticut Botanical Society

9. Connecticut Fund for the Environment

10. Connecticut Land Conservation Council

11. Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

12. Connecticut River Gateway Commission

13. Connecticut River Watershed Council

14. Conserving Tolland

15. Cornwall Land Trust

16. Deep River Land Trust

17. Earth Charter Community of the Lower Valley, Inc.

18. East Haddam Board of Selectmen

19. East Haddam Democratic Committee

20. East Haddam Economic Development Commission

21. East Haddam Land Trust, Inc.

22. Essex Land Trust

23. Friends of Connecticut State Parks

24. Great Meadows Conservation Trust

25. Housatonic Valley Association

26. Lyme Democratic Committee

27. Middletown Conservation Commission

28. Middlefield Board of Selectmen

29. Naugatuck River Revival Group

30. Old Saybrook Land Trust

31. Rivers Alliance of Connecticut

32. Sierra Club - Connecticut

33. The Jonah Center

34. Tidewater Institute

35. Westfield Residents Association

No comments:

Post a Comment