This is almost getting worse instead of better. (Almost?, you say?)
Maybe it's me but it doesn't look like the AP results jive with what the SOTS reports on its website, although both indicate Bridgeport's totals are missing.
By my read of the SOTS numbers, Foley is ahead (556,787 to 548,378).
AP numbers have Malloy ahead by 6240 (Malloy with 565,508 leading Foley with 559,268).
I don't even want to ask what the candidates' own counts are.
No comments:
Post a Comment